23 comments | Leave a comment
Friends
29 November 2009 @ 10:49 pm
29 November 2009 @ 06:50 pm
29 November 2009 @ 05:16 pm
29 November 2009 @ 03:15 pm
Find them here at
To mods: Woops, sorry, didn't know it was locked! Thanks for the heads-up. It's public now :)
29 November 2009 @ 12:16 am
Can someone tell me the texture that was used on these icons? I've seen it on many icons, yet I can't seem to find it anywhere.

Made by:
ohwowlovely

Made by:
29 November 2009 @ 07:22 pm
29 November 2009 @ 01:22 pm
29 November 2009 @ 02:01 am
So what's the deal with these two? I probably missed something somebody said. I just watch the show for dances and fastforward through judges, the pre-dance packages, etc. (Note: I didn't do that in S5; I just feel nothing but bleh towards S6). I don't know who Nathan is, yet apparently he made some comment to Nigel that Nigel won't let go? Someone got a Cliff's Notes version?
28 November 2009 @ 04:09 pm
28 November 2009 @ 12:12 pm
29 November 2009 @ 12:43 am
28 November 2009 @ 08:13 pm
27 November 2009 @ 04:06 pm
Post Anticipated: Albums we're still anticipating from last year's Most Anticipated issue
PANIC! AT THE DISCO
You can't really blame Panic! At The Disco for needing an extension to finish their third album. After all, half of the band left this past summer. "Our band went through a transition which was definitely the right thing for everybody involved," says drummer Spencer Smith. "But we're definitely back on track now." Smith and frontman Brendon Urie have been focusing their efforts on the album for the past several months, only playing a few sporadic shows so the record can be released by summer. "There are a bunch of songs that are more or less done and others that are still at a rough stage with lots of potential," says Smith. "It's still going to be very 'Panic.' There are elements of everything our fans love worked into what we're writing, but it's another step in the evolution of our band."
(source)
28 November 2009 @ 05:05 pm
It's been a long time since the last "recommend" post, so here is a new one!
The purpose of this post is to introduce some new blood to the community, where you (the watchers and members here) can recommend resource makers you feel are top-notch at what they do.
Each of us have our own favorite resource makers and we all run in different resource circles. Because of this there are probably lots of resource makers we (myself and the previous mods) haven't yet discovered, who are really awesome and deserve to be an resource maker here. Here you have the chance to tell me about them!
I'm looking for makers who are already consistently fantastic, people who create and provide creative, unique and various resources, and people who show a lot of potential who would be a great addition to the community in the future.
Some things to keep in mind when making recommendations:
* Don't recommend someone who is already a member. Please check the members list at the bottom of the community profile for a current list of our members/resource makers.
* Links to resources must be publicly available (ie, not friends/members-locked, this includes "this post will be locked in ___ days") and the the resources have to be un-protected. That means, no passwords, or forcing people to comment for the download links. I have to be able to get the textures without having to comment, requiring passwords, membership, being friended, or logging in to access them ect. So please do not recommend someone who has a members locked community, a maker who wants people to comment to get the download link, or someone who password protects their resources ect.
* Do not recommend people who makes text "textures" or text brushes, or people who crop stock images of landscapes/nature/animals/houses/woods/c ars ect or someone who takes other peoples typography art or drawings/art from ffffound, deviantart ect and crop them to "textures". These are not the types of resources we're looking for here at
freshmakers.
* If the person you are recommending has a separate journal/community that they post their resources in, leave the name of that journal/community along with their personal journal.
* Make sure that the person you are recommending has updated at least once in the past two months. Recommending dead journals or people who are no longer creating sharable resources is sort of pointless.
* Make sure the person you are recommending has at least five different resource sets available. Part of what makes
freshmakers such a great community is that the members post top-notch resources consistently. I'd like to be able to look for consistency in the person you're recommending, and I can't do that if they've only ever posted one or two resources.
* Feel free to link to a maximum of three (3) resource posts that you think are outstanding examples of the work done by the person you are recommending. [Do NOT post their work directly in your comment or hotlink to their resources.]
* Keep in mind that not everyone who gets recommended will get invited to become a posting member of the community; such is the nature of the community, of course.
* You can recommenced as many people as you want.
All comments will be screened, just to make sure this post doesn't turn into a popularity contest.
The purpose of this post is to introduce some new blood to the community, where you (the watchers and members here) can recommend resource makers you feel are top-notch at what they do.
Each of us have our own favorite resource makers and we all run in different resource circles. Because of this there are probably lots of resource makers we (myself and the previous mods) haven't yet discovered, who are really awesome and deserve to be an resource maker here. Here you have the chance to tell me about them!
I'm looking for makers who are already consistently fantastic, people who create and provide creative, unique and various resources, and people who show a lot of potential who would be a great addition to the community in the future.
Some things to keep in mind when making recommendations:
* Don't recommend someone who is already a member. Please check the members list at the bottom of the community profile for a current list of our members/resource makers.
* Links to resources must be publicly available (ie, not friends/members-locked, this includes "this post will be locked in ___ days") and the the resources have to be un-protected. That means, no passwords, or forcing people to comment for the download links. I have to be able to get the textures without having to comment, requiring passwords, membership, being friended, or logging in to access them ect. So please do not recommend someone who has a members locked community, a maker who wants people to comment to get the download link, or someone who password protects their resources ect.
* Do not recommend people who makes text "textures" or text brushes, or people who crop stock images of landscapes/nature/animals/houses/woods/c
* If the person you are recommending has a separate journal/community that they post their resources in, leave the name of that journal/community along with their personal journal.
* Make sure that the person you are recommending has updated at least once in the past two months. Recommending dead journals or people who are no longer creating sharable resources is sort of pointless.
* Make sure the person you are recommending has at least five different resource sets available. Part of what makes
* Feel free to link to a maximum of three (3) resource posts that you think are outstanding examples of the work done by the person you are recommending. [Do NOT post their work directly in your comment or hotlink to their resources.]
* Keep in mind that not everyone who gets recommended will get invited to become a posting member of the community; such is the nature of the community, of course.
* You can recommenced as many people as you want.
All comments will be screened, just to make sure this post doesn't turn into a popularity contest.
28 November 2009 @ 10:04 am
LMAO. Nigel says Nathan needs to "engage his brain" every now and again.
He likes Jakob, Russell & Legacy for the guys and Ellenore & Kathryn for the girls.
Nigel explains loss of the three Tappers. He also describes Nathan as "ignorant".
Current Mood:
amused
28 November 2009 @ 04:26 pm
28 November 2009 @ 02:39 pm









